Letters to the Editor
Online Comments of the Week
In response to: "Terrorism in the homeland: Islam begets the radicalism of terrorism," Mar. 18:
You are making a bold statement that condemns the whole Islam as "wicked and backwards." As others have mentioned, to make such a statement you better have some evidence, as it can clearly be offensive. You also said the Quran "implies that most of the faithful know instinctively that the behaviors to which they are supposedly directed by God are vile and immoral." This also needs some citing. And if you want to make such a claim, there are many passages in the Bible that condemn non-believers, are you going to make the same claim to Christianity too? I guess you could just be against all religions as they often foster antagonism against one another, as some think, but I don't see how your attitude encourages more "tolerance" than any of the religions. Your tone is clearly condescending, as you imply Muslims need to be "enlightened" ("in so doing to deny those raised as Muslims the chance for enlightenment"). Your article can and most likely is offensive to the Muslim community. Maybe you're right, some "criticism" against Muslims like this article probably won't make them explode or anything, but that doesn't mean such speech should be encouraged. Again, in the last few paragraphs you condemned Islam to be "backward," "wicked," "dangerous," and "savage," without any citation to the Quran. Unsupported claims are nearly impossible to defend because there are nothing to defense against them. And unsupported "criticism" is not any more acceptable just because the people you are attacking won't be "set off", just like Alexandra Wallace's "criticism" is not acceptable just because Asians won't go around killing people because of that.
Jennifer
I commend the article for boldly stating the facts as I see and feel today and kudos to Eric for taking that stand. We have leaders who are too weak to talk about it openly and I am glad somebody is making a start. keep thinking and writing the way you do.
Kaleem
More from The Rice Thresher
Students of conscience should boycott Local Foods
Local Foods has served, for many years, as a casual Houston restaurant option for Houston residents, including Rice students. Folks on campus will notice that this option has become more proximate, as a Local Foods location claims space on campus in the Brochstein Pavilion.
Insurance options for Ph.D. students are overpriced and insufficient
Doctoral students at Rice are given insufficient health insurance options especially compared to institutions with graduate student unions. Aetna’s graduate student health insurance plan leaves students with significant costs compared to the minimum annual stipend. Additionally, the available Aetna plan offers insufficient benefits when compared both to medical insurance plans at peer institutions and to the non-subsidized Wellfleet plan – Rice’s alternative option for international students.
Keep administrative hands off public parties
Emergency Management is hoping to implement a new system that has students swipe their IDs when entering public parties to cross-check their name with a pre-registered list. This idea is being touted as an effort to reduce check-in time and lines at publics. The thing is – we are tired. After bans on events, APAC and dramatic changes in party requirements, we want hands off the public party.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.