Rice Student Association proposed blanket tax amendment threatens student freedoms
Call me old fashioned, but of all 27 amendments to our Constitution, I still reserve the most love for the first. I love my guns, ability to vote at 18 years of age and right to a fair trial, but I don't believe that anything encapsulates the spirit of our founders more than the freedom of speech. Every day at Rice we see the rights of public discourse in action from an offhand remark of a professor or when reading editorials such as these. At a private university this need not be the case. Many institutions censor their students and I think we as Rice students should take pride that this doesn't happen within the hedges.
I recently attended a college media conference and heard horror stories of private schools where their newspapers were subject to prior review by their student governments and administrations. You can imagine my surprise when I returned to Rice to learn about the innocuously named "By-Law Amendment #1 To Amend Blanket Tax Oversight Procedure" introduced by Student Association President Georgia Lagoudas. Amidst the SA's typically bureaucratic and legalistic language, this amendment contains real dangers to student freedom on campus. The new law would allow the SA to audit blanket Tax organizations including the University Court, KTRU and the Rice Thresher to make sure they are living up to their organizational goals. Well, almost all blanket tax organizations. I imagine the auditing committee of SA members will not provide the same due diligence investigating itself as it does organizations that it could be in conflict with. If these groups fail to meet the SA's ambiguous criteria, then they will be subject either to a direct SA sponsored changing of their funding on the general ballot or referred to university personnel for "special cases." What constitutes a "special case" is never defined.
I do not believe the current SA has an active agenda to limit expression on campus, but a law allowing the important media outlets on campus to go through an audit that assesses easily manipulated criteria represents a huge threat to campus dialogue. If this bill passes, a future SA could clamp down on the democratic process. With the power of the purse it could allow its members to escape negative reporting in the press or action through student judicial organizations. Imagine if President Richard Nixon could defund the New York Times and the Supreme Court if he felt they did not "meet the goals and mission of organization."
This Monday, I went to my first SA meeting to bring up the concerns. The body was mostly receptive to my concerns and tabled the motion for next week, which I was grateful for. However, during the discussion I learned that the SA constitution online was out of date. President Georgia Lagudnas vowed to fix this error, but as of Wednesday the current SA Constitution remains out of the public view.
I am all for tax payer transparency, but there are better ways for students to make sure their annual money goes to good use, such as audits online and in participating in the already existing elections of blanket tax officials. Any amendment should also contain a three year buffer period, so that if the SA decides to remove funds it must wait time to ensure that its reason are purely fiscal. Furthermore we must insist that the SA, also a blanket tax organization, also offer the same transparency. It is unacceptable that we cannot view our own school constitution. As a student body we tend to ignore the SA, but in this issue we must make our voices heard. If this bill passes the SA will gain a level of potential power that would upset the current status quo allowing them to essentially use the funds from the blanket tax as an unstoppable weapon. Look up who your college senator is, send an email to Georgia Lagoudas (sapres@ rice.edu), and let the student government know that it has no business in controlling the press and judicial systems of our campus. Student freedom at Rice may very well depend on it one day.
Anthony Lauriello is a Wiess College senior and is Thresher Backpage editor.
More from The Rice Thresher
Students of conscience should boycott Local Foods
Local Foods has served, for many years, as a casual Houston restaurant option for Houston residents, including Rice students. Folks on campus will notice that this option has become more proximate, as a Local Foods location claims space on campus in the Brochstein Pavilion.
Insurance options for Ph.D. students are overpriced and insufficient
Doctoral students at Rice are given insufficient health insurance options especially compared to institutions with graduate student unions. Aetna’s graduate student health insurance plan leaves students with significant costs compared to the minimum annual stipend. Additionally, the available Aetna plan offers insufficient benefits when compared both to medical insurance plans at peer institutions and to the non-subsidized Wellfleet plan – Rice’s alternative option for international students.
Keep administrative hands off public parties
Emergency Management is hoping to implement a new system that has students swipe their IDs when entering public parties to cross-check their name with a pre-registered list. This idea is being touted as an effort to reduce check-in time and lines at publics. The thing is – we are tired. After bans on events, APAC and dramatic changes in party requirements, we want hands off the public party.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.