Expanding LPAP to LEAP is Right Decision
There has been a lot of discussion centered around the recent proposal to expand the Lifetime Physical Appreciation Program to a more holistic Lifetime Enrichment Activities Program. This campus-wide discussion has inspired me to shed light on why I believe this shift would be beneficial for the Rice student body.
While this is certainly an age where everyone, both in and outside of Rice, needs to take care of themselves physically, this debate is not “pro-physical exercise versus anti-physical exercise:” this is debate centered around the concept of student autonomy. I trust students to make valuable assessments for themselves and take the classes they believe would better benefit their own development.
For years, Rice has been defined by a certain level of student autonomy that can’t be found in many other institutions. Certainly, Rice plays an important role in creating guidelines that are in the best interests of students and the university. Expanding LPAP to LEAP is one step that would realign us to our already existing culture of student freedom while also giving a platform to areas of development that we find important.
When Rice first started requiring students to take physical exercise about 50 years ago, Rice was completely different. Decades ago, Rice mandated a swim test (similar to Cornell's today) and a physical exercise program (which resembled a high school PE course); but at the time, Rice did not have the Recreation Center, dozens of club and IM sports, or “a culture of gains” as one SA member so eloquently put it.
Currently, over 70 percent of Rice students are active in physical activity through NCAA Division 1 sports, club sports, intramural sports and recreation center usage. For the vast majority of students, it would be great to provide them other opportunities to grow instead of doubling down on an area they already cover independently.
Some argue that students should just participate in these other areas of enrichment on their own time, but couldn't the same be said for students ability to participate in physical exercise even without the current LPAP requirement? Students could certainly engage in these leadership, cultural enrichment and financial literacy based enrichment opportunities on their own time, but providing fun, engaging, one-hour courses in the areas identified by LEAP would serve as a more accessible alternative for the many students who are too busy to add on more extracurricular activities. Because students would absolutely still be able to take LPAP courses that interest them under this LEAP proposal, this proposal has an enormous upside for others who may not be super engaged in the LPAP, and little to no downside for people who still personally want to take an LPAP.
As students, we have the responsibility to question aspects about Rice that we hold to be the norm, and ask ourselves if they really do reflect our values.
In my eyes, a one-hour requirement for courses on mental well-being, financial literacy, cultural enrichment, physical exercise, leadership or civic engagement would better represent the wide variety of student interests, values and priorities.
More from The Rice Thresher
Proposed constitutional changes — or power grab?
Four months ago, the Student Association formed a special committee to review its constitution. Two days ago, members of the committee presented their findings, suggesting four major changes to functionally, they say, streamline the SA’s efficiency — granting them “ultimate authority” over Blanket Tax Organizations like student media and Rice Program Council, and eliminating BTO perspectives from the committee that disburses some $300,000 every year.
Students should prioritize American patriotism
A threat to American values has grown rapidly in recent years: the anti-war movement’s shift to an anti-military stance, calling for divesting from, and in effect dismantling, the defense industrial base. The hyperbolic language found here should alarm Rice students because the U.S. military needs those same companies to develop critical technologies in the functioning of U.S. defense.
Consider ethics while designing AI major
From a little-known concept among researchers to generating summaries with every Google search, artificial intelligence’s accessibility has skyrocketed over the past decade. However, its innovation comes at a cost. Training ChatGPT-3 was estimated to generate 552 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, more than the emissions of 559 flights from London to New York. Artificial intelligence can also steal from artists and reproduce racist biases from its data sets.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.