Philosophers debate the problem of evil
The Houston Institute hosted a debate on “The Problem of Evil” at the Glasscock School of Continuing Studies April 2. Rice students and Houstonians filed in to listen to Rob Koons from the University of Texas at Austin and Luis Oliveira from the University of Houston debate how evil could be present assuming God exists.
This event was sponsored by the Houston Institute, an organization which “provides a venue where students can think deeply about the best way to live,” according to their website.
“Though we are rooted in the natural law tradition … we look at the best thinkers with a range of views in a fair-minded way. All students committed to serious intellectual engagement are welcome, regardless of their views,” the website reads.
The debate began with a 25-minute opening argument from both sides, followed by a response from each speaker. The debate continued with a question-and-answer period, where participants could inquire about Koons’ and Oliveria’s claims.
Koons began the debate by proffering various arguments for why God would allow suffering.
“Let’s start with the first obvious [issue], why didn’t God create a world that was full of happiness and devoid of pain?” Koons said in his opening argument. “If we’re going to address this in a religious context … one competing view of ethics is that a morally good person produces as much happiness as possible. But with that model, it doesn’t seem like God’s doing the right job.
“From my Christian perspective, I think we shouldn’t look at it in terms of God being a total happiness maximizer…he’s a God of love, because it’s love of individuals and not adequate quantities [of happiness],” Koons said.
Oliveria made a non-traditional argument, specifically, about how “reflective normative unintelligibility” makes it “dangerous” for humans to trust God. Oliveria defined “reflective normative unintelligibility” as a contradiction that arises when one assigning the value of goodness to God creates concrete expectations for God’s behavior, which are then unmet through his permittance of inexplicable evil.
“If your relationship to God suffers from reflective normative unintelligibility, trusting God isn’t appropriate,” Oliveria said.
According to Victor Saenz, the executive director of the Houston Institute, this debate was an opportunity for students to learn about both sides of the issue in a fair-minded way.
“We deliberately chose two speakers who held very different perspectives, but also deliberately structured debate in a way that they would, in advance, get to see each others’ presentations and respond thoughtfully,” Saenz said.
According to Houston Institute’s Student Club president Jahnavi Mahajan, debates such as this allow her and other Rice students to practice philosophy beyond the classroom.
“I started with Houston Institute in the fall of my freshman year … it was one more way for me to do philosophy beyond class in a more nonplussed way, getting into more discussions [about philosophy],” Mahajan, a Lovett College sophomore, said.
More from The Rice Thresher
Rice accepts 13% of record-setting ED applications
Rice accepted 13.2% of Early Decision applicants in its first round of admissions for the class of 2029, said Yvonne Romero da Silva, vice president for enrollment. With 2,970 total applicants, this year saw yet another record-high; a 3% increase from last year’s previous high of 2,886. An additional 100 students gained admission through the Questbridge National College Match program, an uptick from last year’s 77.
Students reject divestment proposals
The student body voted to pass S.REF 01, which asks the Rice Management Company to disclose all of its holdings investments, but rejected the remaining divestment proposals. While every ballot measure gained a majority of votes in favor, the remaining three did not achieve the two-thirds majority required to pass.
Student organizations form coalition to support SA referenda
Four Student Association referenda open for the general student body vote today at noon. The referenda call for disclosure of Rice Management Company holdings and divestment from entities that profit off the Israel-Hamas war. The referenda also ask that Rice release a statement condemning genocide and materially support anti-colonial scholarship. Voting will close Dec. 11 at noon and the results will be published the next day. For the referenda to pass, a two-thirds majority with a 20% student body turnout is needed.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.