Future of boycott resolution unclear, two discrimination complaints resolved
Rice’s anti-discrimination office has concluded that the Student Association’s proposed boycott and divestment resolution did not violate their policies. It is unclear whether S.RES 02 will be reintroduced at the SA this semester.
Any further action on the resolution could result in subsequent investigations into the resolution, said SA president Jae Kim.
“If we were to vote on it and pass it, that is another actionable thing that the Senate has done that could be subject to its own discrimination investigation,” Kim said. “There’s no clear path … I haven’t talked with the authors of S.RES 02, but it’s not up to us just to bring it back, and I’m not sure what they want to do with that.”
The authors of S.RES 02 did not respond to a request to comment.
S.RES 02 would have implemented an “ethical spending advisory board” to track blanket tax spending and adherence to the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement. In response to its introduction, a student filed a discrimination complaint March 27. As Office of Access, Equity, and Equal Opportunity director Richard Baker investigated the complaint, he ordered the authors of S.RES 02 to halt further discussion.
A second discrimination complaint also has been resolved, this one filed against Matti Haacke, an organizer with Rice Students for Justice in Palestine. The AEEO did not find Haacke or SJP to be in violation of anti-discrimination policies. According to Haacke, the complaint involved posters and chants used by SJP at campus demonstrations and protests. Haacke believes that the reports were politically motivated, he said.
“There’s specific individuals who are trying to weaponize these complaints against SJP,” Haacke said.
Chris Stipes, Rice’s executive director of news and media relations, stated that the university does not publicly comment on specific investigations, especially regarding students.
“In all situations, our nondiscrimination office strives to be responsive, fair and thorough when it reviews allegations brought to its attention,” Stipes wrote in an email to the Thresher. “We encourage anyone who believes they or others have experienced discrimination or misconduct to contact the Office of Access, Equity, and Equal Opportunity.”
One more internal investigation into SJP is still ongoing in response to a complaint filed through the AEEO on July 2, according to Haacke.
Haacke said that the current complaint against SJP echoes the same claims as the previous complaint against him that was resolved. The nature of the complaint and the specifics of the allegations are unclear.
Richard Baker, director of the AEEO, declined to comment.
Haacke alleges that both of the now-resolved complaint investigations were drawn out excessively as a point of leverage against SJP.
“The apparatus of the institution was trying to find a reason and drag out these complaints and … they were unable to do so, and ultimately found no evidence, because these allegations are, at a basis, frivolous,” Haacke said.
In response to the tabling of S.RES 02, Rice SJP said it partnered with the Muslim Legal Fund of America to file a Title VI discrimination complaint against the university.
“The complaint is on behalf of Muslim and Jewish students of Rice who were prohibited from voting on the BDS resolution due to discriminatory and targeted suppression,” Rice SJP wrote in a Sept. 4 Instagram post.
“With the university completing its investigation, that’s great. That’s what they’re supposed to do,” said Christina Jump, MLFA’s civil litigation department head. “However, the actions of the university still require investigation … [and] why they were chilling speech of any kind.”
SJP also recently hosted a “People’s [Orientation]-Week,” which Haacke said was meant to introduce new students to campus activism and the Palestinian liberation movement. As part of the event, SJP returned to the previous “liberated zone” and declared it “Refaat Alareer Square,” named after the Palestinian poet and scholar who was killed in Gaza last year. Haacke said that he hopes the space will become a place for community and connection.
“We’re not going to let some complaints harness our protest, harness our advocacy,” Haacke said.
More from The Rice Thresher
Rice accepts 13% of record-setting ED applications
Rice accepted 13.2% of Early Decision applicants in its first round of admissions for the class of 2029, said Yvonne Romero da Silva, vice president for enrollment. With 2,970 total applicants, this year saw yet another record-high; a 3% increase from last year’s previous high of 2,886. An additional 100 students gained admission through the Questbridge National College Match program, an uptick from last year’s 77.
Students reject divestment proposals
The student body voted to pass S.REF 01, which asks the Rice Management Company to disclose all of its holdings investments, but rejected the remaining divestment proposals. While every ballot measure gained a majority of votes in favor, the remaining three did not achieve the two-thirds majority required to pass.
Student organizations form coalition to support SA referenda
Four Student Association referenda open for the general student body vote today at noon. The referenda call for disclosure of Rice Management Company holdings and divestment from entities that profit off the Israel-Hamas war. The referenda also ask that Rice release a statement condemning genocide and materially support anti-colonial scholarship. Voting will close Dec. 11 at noon and the results will be published the next day. For the referenda to pass, a two-thirds majority with a 20% student body turnout is needed.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.