New demonstration and poster policies seem targeted, lack student input
Rice recently updated its policies on campus demonstration and postering — changes include new restrictions on campus protests and increased vigilance about signage, to name a few. Students need to be informed about these changes. We worry they weren’t.
The administration emailed staff and faculty Aug. 30, informing them of these changes. It’s been 10 days. Students have yet to receive any notice. In the email obtained by the Thresher, the university said the changes were made in the name of clarity. But neglecting to notify students, those who primarily organize demonstrations and hang up posters, is anything but clear. At best, it seems like an oversight. At worst, it seems like Rice is trying to catch students in a “gotcha” moment.
We know these changes follow a wave of tension, at Rice and nationally, as students protested the war in Gaza.
Though we agree with codifying existing campus policies, we believe free speech is more necessary than ever. We’re a newspaper — of course we do.
The campus protest policies seem overly targeted toward long, multi-day demonstrations — much like Rice Students for Justice in Palestine’s “liberated zone” we saw last spring, or any of the many encampments at universities nationwide. However, Rice SJP has consistently met and communicated with administration in advance of their demonstrations, which the Thresher has independently verified. Unlike other campuses, Rice’s protests never seemed too volatile, nor have they resulted in police sweeps or arrests.
Why punish the students who are willing to cooperate with you? It seems like an odd choice for a university that routinely touts its “culture of care.”
Also concerning is the new poster policy, which now allows any Rice employee to remove posters that don’t comply with the rules. We wonder if all employees receive training about Policy 856 and know how to make these judgment calls. If not, they should be — or Rice should revert to an old version of the policy, in which only staff could remove noncompliant posters.
Posters and signage are a form of student expression. Students should know who’s monitoring them.
The lack of transparency here sets a poor precedent. We hope the university can remedy that by communicating with the student body more often, being honest about policy changes and consulting with the people most impacted. Students are willing to communicate. Administration should extend that same courtesy back.
Editor’s Note: News Editor Sarah Knowlton was recused from this editorial due to her corresponding reporting in the news section. Arts & Entertainment Editor Arman Saxena was recused due to his involvement with Rice SJP.
More from The Rice Thresher
Letter from the opinion editor’s desk: Voicing your opinions is important more than ever
The shock I felt as I saw the shelter-in-place order ring on my phone. How my heart raced as a friend and I sought safety in a stranger’s suite at Brown College. How my voice shook as I picked up phone call after phone call from friends, family and colleagues.
Letter from the editor’s desk: Telling the stories closest to home
Last week, I knew what I was going to write here. I spent the night before the semester began reading and re-reading what old editors-in-chief had to say in their welcome letters, picking up on common themes: building trust with readers, supporting student media, running a paper in unprecedented times. Then last week, one hour before our first staff meeting of the year, we received notice of an immediate shelter-in-place: RUPD was investigating a tragic homicide at Jones. Campus shut down, and everything stilled.
Expand affordable and accessible coffee options
Dear Little Kitchen: it’s only been a week, but we already miss you. Please take us back — this new relationship isn’t working for us.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.