Students should weigh in on divestment, investment transparency referenda
On Monday, the Senate passed four referenda calling for Rice to divest, be transparent with their investment holdings, condemn “ongoing genocide and scholasticide” and support “anti-colonial scholarship.” These proposals will now go to an undergraduate-wide student body vote as early as next month.
Resolutions, a formal expression of a Student Association “opinion or policy,” may be approved by a two-thirds vote of the Senate. A referendum, on the other hand, opens “a single political question” up to a general vote from the whole student body, according to (what we think) is the latest version of the SA constitution.
Monday’s vote merely decided that every student should be able to weigh in on these questions. This is a good thing.
To be clear, this is not an endorsement, nor are we offering our opinion on the proposals’ content. But we think you should offer yours.
All students are affected by these referenda, particularly the two concerned with divestment and investments. The former explicitly references Rice’s partnerships with Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Chevron, which often sponsor or partner with various departments across campus. The latter calls for the Rice Management Company, which oversees the university’s $8 billion endowment, to increase transparency about their investment holdings.
The RMC also, notably, manages property holdings in the surrounding area. Current juniors and seniors may remember what we’ve affectionately-dubbed “YoYo-Gate,” when the RMC terminated leases for YoYo’s Hot Dog and Oh My Gogi food trucks operating out of Rice Village in early 2023.
We don’t think the Student Association, which hasn’t seen voter turnout higher than 50% since 2018, should be the sole voice deciding questions like these. In this case, we’re glad they’re not.
Read the proposals. Talk to your new student representatives, your senators, your college presidents. Attend Senate meetings, if you so wish, and ask questions.
The referenda will be voted on soon — although knowing the Senate, probably not that soon — and we hope enough students make their voices heard.
Editor’s Note: Thresher editorials are collectively written by the members of the Thresher’s editorial board. Current members include Riya Misra, Spring Chenjp, Maria Morkas, Sarah Knowlton, Sammy Baek, Shruti Patankar, Juliana Lightsey, Arman Saxena and Kathleen Ortiz.
Arts & Entertainment Editor Arman Saxena was recused from this editorial due to his authorship of the referenda.
More from The Rice Thresher
Students should prioritize American patriotism
A threat to American values has grown rapidly in recent years: the anti-war movement’s shift to an anti-military stance, calling for divesting from, and in effect dismantling, the defense industrial base. The hyperbolic language found here should alarm Rice students because the U.S. military needs those same companies to develop critical technologies in the functioning of U.S. defense.
Consider ethics while designing AI major
From a little-known concept among researchers to generating summaries with every Google search, artificial intelligence’s accessibility has skyrocketed over the past decade. However, its innovation comes at a cost. Training ChatGPT-3 was estimated to generate 552 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, more than the emissions of 559 flights from London to New York. Artificial intelligence can also steal from artists and reproduce racist biases from its data sets.
Abortion is still an option, despite harmful restrictions
Preventable deaths, rising maternal mortality rates, threats to contraception and state-sponsored deception. This is the reality in Texas, two years after the overturn of Roe v. Wade.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.