To the Editors: The title of this piece popped into my head as I visited the Twitter page of the Texas Vanguard, the racist group said to have posted the white supremacist flyers around campus.
I am the alumnus who wrote a one-line critique of the Doerr Institute for New Leaders under the Thresher’s Jan.
I end up comparing myself to other people at Rice and feel like no matter how well I do, it’s never good enough.
To the Editors: We were dismayed to read the content of the Jan. 25 edition of the Thresher Backpage.
To the Editors: The Thresher’s Backpage assures its readers that it’s satire, but let’s pause for a moment to consider what that means.
For many of us, it can be easy to pretend our lives are removed from daily political battles. However, Trump administration’s most recent actions have struck closer to home, visibly impacting the Rice community (see p.
Petroleum is undeniably the lifeblood of the modern economy, but the finite quantities and poisonous consequences of continued use make its long-term future a literal impossibility.
For many Rice students, the Women’s Marches were the first time they were involved in such broad-scale, politically minded activism that took place outside of the voting booth (see p.
I saw a cheesed bread-triangle from a pizza chain the other day and thought, “That’s not food.
This week at the Student Association Senate, the Approval Threshold Committee presented their recommendations for changes to the overload petition process in light of the credit hour cap (see p.
I share a communal bathroom with somebody who keeps their towel in it. Lately, it has developed a strong, gross smell.
When I was a kid, I loved animals and would have been overjoyed at any chance to pet a lemur at a petting zoo. Now, still a passionate animal lover, I want very little to do with such establishments.
I was horrified to see the vandalism of the Berlin Wall segment. Frustrated. Ashamed. Disgusted. Disappointed.
In the Thresher’s previous issue, an investigation uncovered unconstitutional actions in Student Association proceedings.
Last week, the Thresher editorial board published an editorial titled “Proposed CTIS class not a win, but a disappointment.” I find the primary criticism of the article, that omitting certain topics from the mandatory portion of the Critical Thinking in Sexuality workshop to accommodate for certain students “is simply wrong,” is short-sighted and the overall tone of the article is unconstructive. It is incredibly important to keep in mind this workshop is mandatory, something I think the editorial board is failing to do.
To the Editors (and Michael P. O'Donnell, MBA, MPH, PhD), I have had the pleasure of studying at Rice for the last three years.
To the Editors, Recently an article was published titled “Letter to the Editor: Watch what you say” in which Michael P.
While the Critical Thinking in Sexuality class will finally be implemented (see p. 1), the curriculum for the mandatory five sessions features omissions that are simply wrong.
